The Canon EOS 1000D was launched in 10th June 2008 (also known as EOS Kiss F in Japan and the EOS Rebel XS in the rest of the world) – this entry level DSLR was designed and meant to cover the market meant for beginners with their “first DSLR” and those switching from compacts to DSLRs. Manufactured & marketed as the cheapest Canon DSLR money can buy, the EOS 1000D captured the market by surprise with its asking price and built quality. So after 34 months, we get an update.
April 2011, Canon surprised the world again. The Canon EOS 1100D (EOS Kiss X50 in Japan and the EOS Rebel T3 in the rest of the world) was launched with even more surprise! The higher spec-ed EOS 1100D now comes in Maroon Red, Gun Metal Silver, Outdoor Brown & Classic Black. I was lucky to get the Gun Metal Silver for a review from the local guys.
So what has changed? I shall not state all the technical specs here which might bored you out. Instead, I shall highlight its important changes here. For the full specs, google for yourself.
EOS1000D: Digic III/ 10.1mp/ 7 AF Points/ LCD 2.5″/ ISO100-1600/ LP-E5 Battery/ EFS18-55mm F3.5-5.6 IS.
EOS1100D: Digic IV/ 12.1mp/ 9 AF Points/ LCD 2.7″/ ISO100-6400/ LP-E10 Battery/ EFS18-55mm F3.5-5.6 IS II.
As a professional photographer based in Singapore, I find it strange to leave my 1D MkIV & 5D MkII at home while lugging both the EOS1000D & EOS1100D for a test trip to Kuching, Sarawak in East Malaysia. Since I’ve never tried this set up before, I went ahead and brought both cameras with me along with a Manfrotto Tripod Rig with 2 ballheads balancing on a tripod. 🙂
So how does the set up looks like? Here it is. (Ignore my tired face, we just got off the flight)
Test 1: Mountain Path at Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia with lights from setting sun & partial shade.
Both cameras set to 1/100, F6.3, ISO 200, FR 18mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure.
I picked this scene because this is the perfect place to test to sensor’s light sensitivity & metering. As the setting sun cast the shadows on the mountain path, it gets a little tricky for the camera to read its surrounding. So from the test photos above, it is obvious that the EOS1100D has a “cleverer” metering on the shaded areas giving a more balanced exposure and the EOS1000D has a slightly under-exposed photo at the same setting. So my take is, EOS1000D: 0/ EOS1100D:1
Test 2: View from the Mountain at Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia with lights from setting sun & slight haze.
Both cameras set to 1/100, F6.3, ISO 400, FR 55mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure.
This is one tricky scene for the camera. Light is getting dimmer by the minute when I was setting up for this scene. Using the previous setting, I decided to boost up the ISO to 400. The EOS 1000D exposed the vegetations correctly but over exposed the sky and the mountain in the far end. As for the EOS 1100D, it under exposed the vegetations nearer to the camera but still acceptable on overall especially the mountain at the far end can be seen and the sky remains blue. Looking at both photos, the EOS1100D had an advantage over the predecessor and a safer bet too. So my take is, EOS1000D: 0/ EOS1100D:1.
Test 3: View from the Mountain at Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia with lights from setting sun & slight haze.
Both cameras set to 1/320, F9, ISO 200, FR 18mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure.
This is another excellent scene to test the camera. As the sky get darker, both the cameras are put through a comparative test again. The 2 photos above looks very much the same except for the vegetations on the lower left of the photo. The EOS 1100D had metered the vegetations correctly and the scene looks brighter. But it does not really matter as both camera had managed to captured what I had in mind. Looking at both photos, both cams are ok for this scene test. So my take is, EOS1000D: 1/ EOS1100D:1.
Test 4: A church courtyard at the peak of a mountain at Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia with lights from setting sun.
Both cameras set to 1/1000, F9, ISO 800, FR 18mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure.
I picked this scene because I want to see if both the cameras can “read” the scene correctly and how it reacts to a partial shaded and partial well lighted surrounding. From the photos above, both cams “reacted” in the same manner, but if you notice, the area near the top left (under the zinc roof) area, the EOS1100D has a better exposure as compared to the one shot with the EOS1000D while the rest of the photo from both camera looks largely the same. I can live with this slight difference, can you? My take will be , EOS1000D: 1/ EOS1100D:1.
Test 5: A church at the peak of a mountain at Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia with back lights from setting sun.
Both cameras set to 1/200, F10, ISO 400, FR 18mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure.
This is an interesting scene bacause the sun is setting from the back (right side) of the church building and the front of the church (scene as above) is getting darker by the minute. The result was surprising in this case because if you look at the the 2 smaller roof right below the Cross at the top, the under-side of these 2 small roofs, the shot by the EOS 1000D was able to accentuate the darker area in this scene but the the shot from the EOS1100D turned out slightly darker. On the other hand, look at the foreground, the EOS1000D was not able to illuminate the scene as good as the EOS 1100D. So putting to commercial sense, what’s more important to me are the photo must look balanced and properly exposed while I can do away with neglegible details. So my take is EOS1000D: 0/ EOS1100D:1.
Test 6: A flower the size of a 20 cents coin at a house garden at Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia with direct lights from a 10am sun.
Both cameras set to 1/160, F9, ISO 400, FR 55mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure + Flash.
It is now apparent that the photo shot with the EOS1000D with the old kit lens has a limit when I comes to sharpness and magnification ration. Though spec-ed as equivalent with “mild” improvement, the EOS1100D with the new mark II kit lens out performs with its sharpness and details. Megapixel could be at play here as I only managed to magnify the EOS1000D photo to a limit so it looks slightly smaller above. Look at the centre of the flower. The new EOS1100D + new kit lens combo is the clear winner here. EOS1000D: 0/ EOS1100D:1.
Test 7: Long exposure at night at a river park facing the Astana Palace at Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia.
Both cameras set to 30 seconds, F18, ISO 100, FR 18mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure.
OK, both the photo looks the same right? Read on.
I decided to zoom in. Both cameras set to 30 seconds, F18, ISO 100, FR 55mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure.
Still look the same at 55mm? OK, let’s blow things up a little.
The cut section photo above shows a distinctive difference at 100% when both photos are magnified. The EOS1000D combo is not as sharp as the EOS1100D combo. Noise is apparent for the EOS1000D shot, which I conveniently blamed the Digic III processor as opposed to the EOS 1100D’s Digic IV. New is better, it is very true here. 0:1.
Test 8: Multi-Shot Burst at High speed at night by a river park facing the Astana Palace at Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia.
Both cameras set to 1/200 seconds, F3.5, ISO 100, FR 18mm, Evaluative Metering, AWB, Spot Focus on Centre AF, Manual Exposure+flash, set to burst mode. (set to AI Servo)
Well you must be thinking why only 5 shots from the EOS1000D and 10 shots from the EOS1100D. Well, both cameras were actuated at the same time but the EOS1000D only managed to snap 5 shots while the EOS1100D shot 10, both camera started and ended at the same time. (Thanks Shela for lending your finger.) And out of the 5 shots from the EOS1000D, only 3 are sharp when viewed at 100% and the EOS1100D gave me 10 sharp photos. Oh Wow!
So, EOS1000D: 0/ EOS1100D:1.
The test shots above had the EOS1100D beating the EOS1000D 8:2. Let’s see how both cameras fared in other areas.
Based on the score sheet that I brought along to Kuching to test the cameras with my set of test criterias, the EOS 1000D scored 25/50 while the EOS 1100D scored an impressive 47/50.
My personal view is, the EOS1100D is closer to the slightly “higher classed” XXXD series now. It feels good on my hand (which is more used to 1D-Series cameras) and it does not feels out of place. The finishing for the EOS1100D is of superb quality, the handgrip feels larger and purposeful and well sorted. So the EOS also scores on the ergonomic stats for this. With a little visual orientation of the dials and buttons, I can find all my familar icons and so EOS1100D is not a pain to use even for professional photographers who may wish to have a lighter casual camera when not on commercial jobs. The specs are built to lure and asking price is priced to sell.
If you considering to move from prosumer compact to a DSLR camera, the EOS 1100D is an excellent choice – to start.
Below are some “Behind the Scene” photos – Courtesy of Ling Tan (Shutter Journey)